Discover how audio compression works, its role in preserving storage space, and how it affects music quality. Learn about lossy vs. lossless formats and how to find the best listening experience.
We have all come across debates suggesting that music can be “compressed” and that using less compressed or uncompressed formats makes it sound much better. But what do we understand by this term, and how does it play tricks with your most beloved tracks or beats? In this post, we will take a closer look at the science and art of audio compression in order to explain what it involves and how it affects sound quality.Â
The Foundation of Digital Audio: Sampling and the Nyquist Theorem
To understand compression, first, we need to understand digital audio. This is based on the Whittaker-Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, which is named in honor of Nyquist and Shannon’s pioneers. This theorem is one of the foundations of how sound is encoded digitally.
The theorem states that sound has to be sampled at a rate more than twice the maximum frequency of the audio. For example, when CDs sample sound, they do so at 44.1 kHz, which allows them to record up to 22.05 kHz, just slightly above the range of recognisable sound for the human ear.
This approach balances the two. If we try to take samples at an even greater rate, the size of the file increases, and the possible quality improvements are less discernible to our ears due to the limitation of the human auditory system. At present, a number of audio formats have bitten the CD-quality standard with sample rates of 48 kHz and above; however, the difference is hardly noticeable by most people.
Lossy vs. Lossless: Two Paths to Compression
Audio compression comes in two main types: lossless and lossy.
- Lossless Compression: There are formats, like FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec), that compress music but do not remove any data. This retains the original quality of the encoding but results in rather bulky files—about fifty percent bigger than the raw audio obtained from a CD.
- Lossy Compression: Formats like MP3 or AAC reduce file size by discarding “unnecessary” audio data. Psychoacoustic models decide which sounds to ignore: those at frequencies that people cannot hear, or sounds which louder ones overtake.
Although the file size is small, lossy compression can change the quality of the listening experience. Certain sounds, like the ambiance of a live room or the richness of certain instruments, can be removed. At low bit rates (like 128kbps), this can cause the music to sound “flat” or “lifeless.”
We observe that lossy compression sounds good for everyday use, particularly at high bit rates (such as 320 kbps), but critical listeners tend to choose lossless formats for the best sound quality.
The Role of Sample Rate and Bit Depth
Audio compression isn’t the only factor influencing quality—sample rate and bit depth play equally crucial roles.
- Sample Rate: This measures how often the audio is sampled per second. Higher sample rates, such as 96 kHz, capture more detail but also increase file sizes.
- Bit Depth: This is ironical of the dynamics, the variation from the highest and lowest penetrative intensities in a given stream of sound. Another feature is that the new format, for instance, 24-bit, records more details than the 16-bit used by CDs.
When audio is encoded in lossy formats, these parameters are usually decreased, which can reduce the richness of the sound. For instance, one could lose background ambiance or subtle inflections within any track that might include instrumental harmonies, making the sound perhaps even more brutal or less reverberative than it must be.
Recognizing Poor Compression
We’ve all encountered poorly compressed audio, and even if you’re not an audiophile, the signs are often noticeable:
- Clipping: Loud sounds are distorted or cut off.
- Metallic Sound: Over-aggressive compression can give music a “tinny” or robotic quality.
- Loss of Dynamics: The music may lack energy and impact.
- Echo or Warble: Vocals or sustained notes might sound distorted, akin to the “flutter” heard on old vinyl or cassette recordings.
Want to hear the difference yourself? Take two tracks of the same song – one recorded at a low bit rate, for instance, 128 kbps, and the other at a high bit rate of 320 kbps. In full uncompressed audio, you’ll probably, for instance, be able to discern richer spectral balance at a higher bitrate for the more complicated pieces, anything from symphonic to concert.
Finding the Sweet Spot
Because of the great technology in storing and compressing data, audio files today are highly compressed yet of high quality. There are two types of VBR Variable Bitrate, whereby the encoding speed varies from fast to normal to slow, preserving the quality where needed while minimizing it where not.
The average user has a high-quality file that uses 320 kbps mp3 or an AAC file that is encoded well. On the other hand, lossless formats like FLAC are the best choice if you’re aiming for a very high level of correspondence – especially for historical purposes or when professionals or other experts will use the audio.
Conclusion
One thing that stands out often is the amount of effort put into balancing file size, quality, and usability for audio formats. The difference between lossless and lossy compression can sometimes significantly affect sound quality, but contemporary technologies enable perfect sound for normal listeners without huge disc space.
Finally, it comes down to how you listen to your recordings, which format is most comfortable for you, and your audio editing software. Lossy formats are useful for everyday streaming and portable devices, while lossless formats are preferable for professional use. However, the lossless search could be very inspiring when it comes to particular tracks or moments where even the smallest detail may be crucial.
This brief introduction to audio compression aims to demonstrate the complexity of the process and allow readers to reflect on the tremendous work that goes into the present-day consumption of music and other audio pieces.
Also Read: Chrome Brings a Bookmarks Bar to Android: What to Expect
About the Author
